I never said it should. To assume guilt without proof, however, allows the party to be manipulated from the outside by those who would accuse the members of heinous acts. If the party then suspends all who are accused without proof, how much work can they truly get done, while waiting for such proof that may never arise.

[A ticked up eyebrow.]

To the specific instance of Xavier-sensei: His proxy, which I understand is a legal term, spoke to the network in a timely manner. It was my understanding from that posting that he was unable to speak.

Has any evidence to the contrary been uncovered?